OMNeT++/OMNEST Bug Tracker

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0000100OMNeT++simulation kernelpublic2009-09-01 09:562011-07-15 15:15
Assigned To 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version4.0 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0000100: Reordering of run numbers would help to support variable number of repetitions
DescriptionCurrently repetitions of a parameter set lead to consecutive run numbers. This makes it difficult to realize the following workflow:

- Run a parameter study with a small number of repetitions
- Check the results and confidence intervals
- Run the same parameter study with an increased number of repetitions without having to discard previous simulation results.

An easy solution would be to reorder run numbers, so that first all parameter combinations with repetition=0 and after that all parameter combinations with repetition=1 are simulated

 an ini file
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships

-  Notes
andras (administrator)
2009-09-03 17:11

Makes sense :) We'll do it.
rhornig (administrator)
2011-07-15 15:15

There is a workaround for this:
- instead of using e.g.

define a dummy iteration variable and set it to act as your repetion counter and set also the measurement-label and repetition-label. Provided that the iteration variabler are numHosts and mean, put the followring BEFORE the definition of these variables (and remove the repeat= line)

measurement-label = $numHosts=${numHosts}, $mean=${mean}
replication-label = "#${myRep}"
# rest of iteration variables
Aloha.numHosts = ${numHosts=10,20}[*].iaTime = exponential(${mean=1,4,5..9 step 2}s)

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-09-01 09:56 baumgart New Issue
2009-09-03 17:11 andras Note Added: 0000169
2011-07-15 15:15 rhornig Note Added: 0000524

Copyright © 2000 - 2022 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker